Permanent Recruitment Vs New Form of Employment
Permanent Recruitment Vs New Form of Employment
Permanent
workers are more
popular in the job market. The permanent worker holds the power of the
organization and they are loyal to the organization because they possess the
organizational benefits directly. Most importantly permanent workers have the
job security, fixed salary scheme, proper promotion procedures, fixed working
hours, retirement benefits and also most of the permanent workers are eligible
for paid vacations, insurance coverage for spouse or family and can be selected
for local and foreign HR training secessions (N. D. Cuyper, H. D. Witte, 2007).
The permanent workers are counted as a real organizational asset.
On the other hand, as a permanent worker is limited to a frame of work and work under the same management.
Full-time workers have limited space for self-development and barriers to
knowledge acquisition in new market trends.
Recently
there is a new trend that organizations are trying to move to temporary
recruitments rather than recruiting permanent staff (P. Allan, S. Sienko,
2011). Therefore, new forms of employment such as Employee sharing, Interim
management, casual workers & portfolio work etc. enhances workers to step
into the new job market.
New
forms of employment give
employees to experience different management techniques, acquire new knowledge,
diversification of work, flexibility, autonomy, empowerment, creation of new
job opportunities in the market, to demand knowledge and higher monitory
benefits etc. This, in turn, will create job satisfaction.
From the Organization’s point of view,
these new forms of employment will create the labour market more innovative and
attractive and thereby the employer’s recruitment criteria could be easily met.
The Organization can be benefited by getting the maximum outcome from such
recruited employees. These forms of employment will contribute to reducing
certain overhead cost items in the Financial Statements. For example, the term
“Employee sharing” allows a group of employers to share individual expert
employee and subsidiary companies can get expert knowledge for minimum cost.
Therefore, a new form of employment gives
value to an employee as well as employer’s recruitments and flexibility in the working system improves employee effectiveness and engagement of work.
References
N. D. Cuyper, H. D. Witte, 2007. Job insecurity
in temporary versus permanent workers: Associations with attitudes,
well-being, and behaviour. [Online]
Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02678370701229050
[Accessed 20 05 2019].
Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02678370701229050
[Accessed 20 05 2019].
P. Allan, S. Sienko, 2011. Journal of Employment Counseling. [Online]
Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2161-1920.1998.tb00999.x
[Accessed 18 05 2019].
Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2161-1920.1998.tb00999.x
[Accessed 18 05 2019].
Sviokla, J.J.,
1996. Knowledge workers and radically new technology. MIT Sloan Management Review, 37(4), p.25.
Felfe, J., Schmook, R., Schyns, B. and Six, B., 2008. Does
the form of employment make a difference?—Commitment of traditional,
temporary, and self-employed workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), pp.81-94.
Henderson, H.
and Henderson, H., 1996. Building a win-win world: Life beyond global economic warfare. Berrett-Koehler
Publishers.
Even though the permanent employee has lack of opportunities with changing technologies and other knowledge as you mentioned since they have to operate under same management and same job frame it will be an disadvantage to them.But one side they are in the safe zone of not having a job. But with new employment as you have mentioned it will solve the problem and gives value to an employee as well as employer’s recruitment and flexibility in the working system improves employee effectiveness and engagement of work.
ReplyDelete